The Canadian Commercialization Cliff

Toronto Tech Week and “Something”

Toronto Tech Week (TTW) was about two months ago. Met fantastic people, learned new things, watched an AI agent builder's competition, and was reminded multiple times of something. That “something” is the meat and potatoes of today’s thought.

Canada has a problem. As a nation, we’re not too good at turning our abundance of early/seed stage startups into firms that compete on the global stage.

What does that mean? Why does it matter? In the sections that follow, I’ll unpack where momentum stalls, why it happens, and six levers you can control today…like right now.

My goal is to help you, the entrepreneur, understand the environment in which you are building your business. Although the goal is to foster understanding - I’m not going to write this like a report. I read a bunch of those papers to write this, and I definitely do not want you to be bored to death. Rather, empowered. Knowledge is power, right?

Canada’s “Scale-Up Gap”: Where Momentum Dies

You can’t have an environment where the largest player is a government-sponsored balance sheet whose entire goal is money velocity and job creation. You need to have private actors who are purely motivated by profit, because in the absence of that, you’re perverting the market.” — Chamath Palihapitiya, Toronto Tech Week 2025.

On Tuesday, June 24th, I listened to Chamath Palihapitiya talk on stage at the Tech Week Homecoming event; this line was heavy. After thinking about this on and off recently, I can say that I agree…but it’s complicated.

Canada’s startup engine hums, and after a three-year slide we’re finally inching back up. Our Global Innovation Index rank climbed from 15th in 2023 to 14th in 2024. Rebounding rankings owe more to research inputs (we rank 8th) than to market traction (20th in outputs). Our venture pools shrank by half in deal value last year, illustrating that research strength still isn’t converting into the patient capital scale-ups need. Those growth flywheels (>$10 M revenue, ≥20 % annual growth for three years) remain too few: Ottawa aimed for 28,000 by 2025, yet only 10,700 existed in 2020 - recent funding headwinds suggest we fell short.

A few definitions for you before we start

Patient Capital - Long-horizon investment capital that accepts lower liquidity and slower returns to back high-risk, high-growth ventures over multiple years.

“TAM Slides” - Deck slides that illustrate a startup’s Total Addressable Market. Essentially, the full revenue opportunity for its product or service.

“VCCI” - The Venture Capital Catalyst Initiative, a Government of Canada program that co-invests alongside private funds to increase venture capital availability for Canadian innovative firms.

SIF (Strategic Innovation Fund) - is a Canadian government program that provides funding to support large-scale, transformative projects in business innovation, growth, and competitiveness.

Seed-Stage Boom vs. Global Heavyweights

Note: Bars show disclosed Pre-seed/Seed/Early/Late rounds only. Venture-growth and unclassified/undisclosed amounts are not shown, so the stage sum ($865M) doesn’t equal Q1-2025 total VC ($1.26B). All figures CAD. Source: CVCA Q1-2025.

Plenty of sparks: over 800 tech startups launched in just the first half of 2024. Yet few survive the funding gauntlet. Q1 2025 saw the lightest Canadian VC deal count since 2020, with pre-seed and seed cheques especially scarce, our “Series A desert” in real time.

Comparison of startup funding stages in 2024 shows the US prioritizing growth investments, with two-thirds at Series C+; the UK and Canada focus more on early stages, with higher percentages in early VC and pre-seed/seed rounds.

Despite the identical-looking stage-mix percentages, the raw cheque volume still tells the real story. In 2024, U.S. investors wrote US$215.4 billion in venture cheques; Canada managed C$7.86 billion (~ US$5.9 billion), a gap of roughly 35-to-1. Even after adjusting for population, the gap hardly shrinks: the U.S. deploys about US $640 of VC per resident, while Canada must make do with ~US $145, 4.4× fewer dollars per head.

The imbalance widens where scale really matters. Growth-stage companies in the U.S. soaked up US$143 billion last year, or roughly US$425 per American; Canada’s entire Series C-plus pool was ≈ US$3.3 billion, barely US$80 per Canadian.

All figures are in USD

Smaller pools mean smaller cheques, faster dilution, and a structural nudge for ambitious Canadian scale-ups to price their next raise in New York or San Francisco.

So, why does momentum stall?

Let’s unpack the frictions that cause this before diving into how the gears are working

• Patient capital drought: domestic investors skew conservative, nudging founders toward early exits or U.S. funds.

• Senior-talent shortage: scaling sales and ops leaders leave for NYC/SF paycheques and opportunity.

• Digital investment gap: Canada’s business R&D (BERD) and investment in intellectual-property products are below the OECD average, even as higher-ed R&D is strong.

• Fragmented policy mix: generous SR&ED credits help R&D, but procurement and targeted scale-up programs lag, reinforcing a risk-averse business culture.

  
  

  Outcome: promising ventures idle just as they should be accelerating; Canada’s productivity, job creation, and global influence all feel the drag.

Three Gears in Practice - The Triple Helix

Canada’s innovation machine is supposed to run on a three-gear system: universities create ideas, industry commercializes them, and government oils the whole engine. In reality, the cogs keep slipping.

Industry: late to the party, quick to cash out.

Corporate Canada and most domestic financiers show up only once risk is scrubbed down. Seed cheques? Sparse. In 2024, we deployed $7.86 billion in VC, yet 62 % of that went to mega-deals while seed funding hit a five-year low at $510 million. Founders call the money “impatient capital”: flip-focused, five-year horizons, little appetite for messy R&D.

Outcome: promising tech firms either bootstrap, swallow thin valuations, or court U.S. funds (Americans touched 32 % of all Canadian deals last year).

Startup Funding by Stage in Canada (2020-2025): Visual depiction of investment trends in pre-seed, seed, early, later, and growth equity stages, highlighting significant scaling in 2021 with peak investment across early, later, and growth equity stages.

Government: filling gaps with red tape.

Ottawa’s tool-kit - SIF, VCCI, and super-clusters has grown thicker as private risk tolerance shrank. Programs sprawl like a choose-your-own-bureaucracy maze: multi-month timelines, overlapping mandates, and success metrics tied to job counts, not market power. Tax credits such as SR&ED remain broad and neutral; scale-up founders keep asking for targeted demand-side boosts like procurement guarantees instead.

Universities: world-class science, lukewarm spin-outs.

Higher-ed R&D spending is flowing, yet business expenditure on R&D still trails the OECD average. Tech-transfer offices push patents faster than markets can absorb them, often selling IP early to foreign buyers. What industry really harvests is talent, not turnkey technologies. Meanwhile, business curricula underserve sales and go-to-market skills, the very muscles needed post-lab.

Intermediaries: bridges or bottlenecks?

Incubators and accelerators patch some fissures, but mission creep and uneven quality dilute impact. Affiliating with four different programs might signal “investable” to VCs, yet it rarely substitutes for customers or capital.

Outcome: the Triple Helix spins, but off-axis. Government overcompensates, universities over-produce, and industry under-commits. Until the gears bite in unison, Canada’s scale-up gap will stay stubbornly wide.

Founder Frictions

1. Patient Money That Isn’t.

Seed cheques have fallen off a cliff: pre-seed and seed dollars sank 48 % in H1 2024 and the typical Series A now drags on for months. Domestic funds prefer late-stage “mega-deals”; seed-stage activity was just $510 million across 201 deals last year. With U.S. investors touching one-third of all Canadian rounds and local acquirers scarce, founders either bootstrap, load up on venture debt (a record $881 million in 2024), or accept thin valuations.

2. Bureaucracy, Risk Aversion & IP Drift.

Navigating Ottawa’s grant maze means red tape, age caps, and success metrics that prize jobs over competitiveness. Add conservative customers and slow-burn procurement cycles and you get a culture that hesitates to buy or build boldly. Meanwhile, loose IP strategies see home-grown tech licensed abroad before it ever scales at home.

3. Talent Tug-of-War.

Senior sellers and product operators still chase NYC/SF paycheques. Universities pump out stellar coders, yet practical go-to-market skills lag; many startups “underfund sales for way too long” and stall at the first global push.

Outcome: even well-positioned founders fight for oxygen just when they should be sprinting.

What You Can Control, Six Levers at Your Fingertips

Yes, the macro backdrop is choppy, but your preparation and execution aren’t hostages to interest-rate headlines. Diagnosis done.

Now let’s look at the six levers you can pull today to stack the odds in your favor.

Prove it, don’t pitch it.

Keep immaculate books, monitor your KPIs weekly, and walk into every investor call with a living data room. Deep-dive diligence is the 2025 default; show month-over-month traction, not theoretical TAM slides.

Plan for a 12-month runway to close a round.

Map who might lead the cheque a year out. Existing backers, strategic, or VCCI-funded firms - and court them early. Insider participation is now table stakes.

Run the business while you fundraise.

Deal fatigue kills momentum; delegate ops so the machine keeps shipping features and booking revenue while you’re on the circuit.

Get your corporate house spotless.

Tight cap table, clean IP ownership, signed customer contracts, SR&ED files ready, anything loose will slow or tank the deal.

Diversify the capital stack

Mix non-dilutive grants, venture debt, and customer revenue to stretch cash and avoid down rounds. Government programs are slow, but free money beats cheap equity.

Differentiate through sales, not slides.

Canada’s achilles heel is an underfunded go-to-market. Hire sales killers early, design for export markets from day one, and let revenue speak louder than accelerator badges.

Control these variables and the rest, interest rates, trade skirmishes, jittery LPs, becomes background noise.

Path Forward: Build Global, Defend Hard, Play Long

Treat Canada’s 2025 capital market as a staging ground, not a finish line. Design every product for export on day one, universal standards, multilingual UX, and pricing that scales. Wire an IP plan straight into that roadmap: lock down patents, own your data layer, and track the standards boards shaping your stack. Use non-dilutive cash (ISC contracts, SR&ED refunds, venture debt) to fund those first international wins, then walk in front of patient capital with proof you can sell, defend, and out-run copycats. If you can master this sequence, then you’re definitely on the right path forward.

Final Thoughts

Canada does have the right foundational systems, but they’re underperforming, and that’s costing us. I'm not trying to cast a shadow and/or be Mr. Doom and Gloom. It is by no means impossible to build a great company here. Right now, it requires more grit and creativity.

While this post speaks primarily to founders, teams, and policymakers, my belief runs deeper than that. Whether you're an entrepreneur, an investor, a professor, a student, or someone quietly building something in stealth mode. It’s on all of us to create the kind of environment that grows greatness and keeps it here.

I don’t blame people for leaving. Ambition deserves oxygen. We feel the loss every time talent or innovation slips away for good. In practice, that oxygen is late-stage capital, de-risked procurement, and global go-to-market muscle. 

If nothing else, I hope this piece nudges you to reflect on where you’re building, why it matters, and how we might shape a future where staying feels just as smart as leaving.

Source List....If you'd like to dive deeper into this topic

Bramwell, A., Hepburn, N., & Wolfe, D. A. (2019). Growing entrepreneurial ecosystems: Public intermediaries, policy learning, and regional innovation. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 8(2), 272–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-04-2019-0034

Business in Vancouver. (2025, May). B.C.’s venture capital sector faces Q1 downturn in deals and investment. (URL not provided)

Canadian Venture Capital & Private Equity Association. (2025). Year-End 2024 — Canadian venture capital & private equity market overview. https://intelligence.cvca.ca/year-end-2024-vc-pe-canadian-market-overview

Canadian Venture Capital & Private Equity Association. (2025, May 14). Q1 2025 — Canadian venture capital market overview. https://intelligence.cvca.ca/t/q1-2025-venture-capital-overview/

Canadian Venture Capital & Private Equity Association. (2025, August 13). H1 2025 — VC & PE Canadian market overviews. https://www.cvca.ca/insights/reports

Denney, S., Southin, T., & Wolfe, D. A. (2023). Do winners pick government? How scale-up experience shapes entrepreneurs’ assessments of innovation policy mixes. Science and Public Policy, 50(5), 858–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad030

Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada. (2019, October 2). Helping Canadian firms start up, scale-up and grow: Indicators and targets. https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/innovation-better-canada/en/tracking-progress-and-results-innovation-and-skills-plan/indicators-and-targets-helping-canadian-firms-start-scale-and-grow

Kirkwood, I. (2025, June 18). What founders need to know about raising in 2025. BetaKit. https://betakit.com/what-founders-need-to-know-about-raising-in-2025/

Matta, P. (2024, September 20). Canadian startup formation data from Panache Ventures points to future demand for capital. BetaKit. https://betakit.com/canadian-startup-formation-data-from-panache-ventures-points-to-future-demand-for-capital/

McIntyre, C. (2025, May 14). Canadian venture capital deals plummet to 5-year low. The Logic. (URL not provided)

National Venture Capital Association. (2025, March 27). NVCA releases 2025 yearbook showcasing 2024 U.S. VC trends [Press release]. https://nvca.org/pressreleases/nvca-releases-2025-yearbook-showcasing-2024-u-s-vc-trends/

National Venture Capital Association. (2025). 2025 NVCA Yearbook. https://nvca.org/research/yearbook/

PitchBook & National Venture Capital Association. (2025, January 14). PitchBook-NVCA Venture Monitor, Q4 2024: Key trends. https://pitchbook.com/venture-monitor

Rezkalla, E., Landon, J., Rowe, A., & Dong, L. (2019, April). Scaling start-ups: Challenges in Canada’s innovation ecosystem [Conference paper]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343450223

Robbins, M. D., & Crelinsten, J. (2018, September). Accelerating growth: Canadian funding policy for innovation intermediaries. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327449107

Scott, J. (2025, June 16). Toronto-Waterloo, Vancouver, Ottawa drop in Startup Genome’s 2025 global ecosystem rankings as Montréal, Calgary hold steady. BetaKit. https://betakit.com/toronto-waterloo-vancouver-ottawa-drop-in-startup-genomes-2025-global-ecosystem-rankings-as-montreal-calgary-hold-steady/

Statistics Canada. (2024, November 6). Entrepreneurship indicators of Canadian enterprises, 2022. The Daily. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quotidien/241106/dq241106c-eng.htm

Toronto Tech Week. (2025, June). The future of AI, energy, and entrepreneurship with Chamath Palihapitiya & Tobi Lütke [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/@TorontoTechWeek/videos

Investing in Sweden: Transaction value analysis. (2023). https://www.svca.se/rapporter/investing-in-sweden-transaction-value-analysis-2023/

WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024: Unlocking the promise of social entrepreneurship (17th ed.). https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2024-en-global-innovation-index-2024.pdf

WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2024). GII 2024 at a glance. https://www.wipo.int/web-publications/global-innovation-index-2024/en/gii-2024-at-a-glance.html

WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization). (2024). Canada ranking in the Global Innovation Index 2024. https://www.wipo.int/gii-ranking/en/canada

Wolfe, D. A. (2019, January). A digital strategy for Canada: The current challenge (IRPP Insight No. 25). Institute for Research on Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22510.46402

World Bank. (2025). Population, total (SP.POP.TOTL) — Canada. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=CA

World Bank. (2025). Population, total (SP.POP.TOTL) — United States. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.TOTL?locations=US